Like many tech enthusiasts, I followed last week’s Apple event closely. Steve Jobs unexpectedly took the stage, but the company announced an expected product: the iPad 2. Although not nearly as revolutionary as the original, the second generation model brings refined hardware improvements. Extras such as cameras are also a great addition, however there is one major flaw: iOS.
Do Hardware Specs Matter?
This questions comes up quite often and the answer is not simple. Apple’s original iPad was a game changer since there was nothing else like it on the market. Tablet PCs had been around for ages, but they still ran a desktop operating system. While I adore Windows 7 and use it primarily for all my work, it is far from being ideal for tablets. With the introduction of iOS, hardware specs for tablets became more along the lines of a smart phone rather than a laptop computer.
Although 2010 was definitely the year of the iPad, 2011 has an entirely new landscape. Competition such as the BlackBerry PlayBook, HP TouchPad, Motorola Xoom, Samsung Galaxy Tab 10, and LG G-Slate each offer a very similar set of features. There are some benefits and drawbacks to each which we highlighted in our series of infographics, but the specifications are roughly the same. They are so close in some regards that it truly does not make a difference to consumers.
Software Matters Too
While hardware specifications were all the rage for ages, easy to use and intuitive software has pushed for consumer friendly devices. Apple made a great decision when they chose to run iOS on the iPad instead of Mac OS X last year. The interface was efficient, familiar, and simple. The iPhone was already a hit and the iPad was a perfectly complement to the family.
Although I do not own an iPad, I spent some time using and reviewing it last year. There were many missing features at the time, however iOS ran incredibly smoothly. Fast forward a year later, not much has changed aside from the addition of multitasking. The new iPad 2 makes things faster with a dual-core processor, but the operating system is nearly identical.
This creates a major issue for Apple as we head into the flooded market of tablets in 2011. The current iOS for the iPad is essentially an enlarged version of the operating system for the iPhone and iPod touch. The platform was a great start, but the original design does not take advantage of the tablet form factor. Although I was hoping for a new refreshing interface, Apple did not announce a major software revamp for the iPad 2 aside from a few minor enhancements.
The Competition Has Caught Up
There are many amazing iPad apps that take advantage of 9.7 inch screen, but the operating system does not go far enough. Google, HP, and RIM have started from the ground up with new tablet operating systems that take the slate form factor into consideration from the OS level. BlackBerry Tablet OS, webOS 3, and Android 3.0 Honeycomb each offer many user interface improvements which are more innovative and intuitive than iOS.
For instance, HP’s latest webOS 3 lets users stack sets of applications together for organized multitasking. Google’s Android 3.0 Honeycomb has an impressive notifications panel for keeping up to date with the latest information without letting pop ups disrupt work flow. It is not just about multitasking and notifications either, these new breed of tablets offer creative home screens with widgets and improved navigation for getting things done fast.
It’s Also About The Apps
In addition to beyond impressive sales, Apple’s App Store count is far ahead of competition. Steve Jobs proudly noted that there are over 65,000 iPad optimized apps while less than 100 are optimized for Android tablets. It is also important not to forget that the quality of apps also matter. Apple’s out of the box apps are amazing and many third-party apps are even better.
However, you will probably change your mind once you try Android 3.0 Honeycomb. The default bundled apps truly highlight the true potential for Google’s new operating system. Everything from the Browser, Calendar, Chat, Contacts, Email, Maps, and Music apps are incredibly innovative. They look gorgeous, have more features, and actually very easy to use. This is a small indicator of the likely nature of upcoming third-party Android tablet apps.
Keep in mind that the Motorola Xoom is the only Android 3.0 Honeycomb tablet on the market so far and it is less than a month old. Apple iOS for the iPad is about a year a more mature than all the others. Competitors, including Google, are still far behind Apple when it comes to tablet sales, but they are moving up the ladder faster with better technology.
To Buy Or Not To Buy
If you are ready for a tablet, you may want to think a moment before dropping cash for the iPad 2. It is a great product, but it is only a slight advancement to the previous iteration. Apple has yet to announce or make any mention of iOS 5. It is unclear what the next generation operating system will offer or if every feature would even carry over to the iPad 2. Other tablets are already getting a head start with features such as 4G connectivity, integrated mobile hotspots, flash player, video chat over a cellular networks, and expandable storage. While the iPad 2 will by no means disappoint if you know what you are buying, consider the available options if you are open to unique alternatives.
“consider the available options if you are open to unique alternatives” – like paying more money for less quality and tech (4G/LTE) that is not yet widely adopted OR available.
I suspect 90% of tablet buyers in 2011 will opt for the iPad.
The Samsung Galaxy Tab (7 inch) alone pushed Apple’s tablet market share down to under 80% in Q4 of last year from nearly 95%. The iPad 2 will give the company a huge boost, but there are even more tablets on the market now. Streak 7 was a bit of a bummer, but the Motorola Xoom is a pretty awesome device. The Galaxy Tab 10, LG G-Slate, and HP TouchPad are also very impressive. Each of these will appeal to different people with different tastes. Not to mention BlackBerry PlayBook might do well with enterprise adoption.
Point being, Apple will sell more iPad 2 devices than they ever have, but their market share will continue to shrink in 2011.
Umm, the galaxy tab 10 was already but back on the drawing board after seeing the iPad 2…
The Galaxy tab number was units SHIPPED, not units SOLD. Shipping 2 million units into supply chain is nothing, every major manufacture with large supply chain can do that. It’s how long it will take to push those units out to consumers that matters. Which I guess isn’t happening at the moment, otherwise, Samsung executive wouldn’t have just termed it “smooth”, but saying something like “beyond our wildest dream”.
all the company people wasting everyones valuable time, new model, latest model,breaking model, ipad1 , ipad2 , ipad3, ipad…………(no body no where it ends).
iPad 2 is the total package right now. Xoom is a work in progress, everyone has said the product was rushed out to try and steal some of Apple’s thunder. Not giving the others a second thought. This year belongs to iPad 2 for sure. Next year will be a different story. I suspect a major overhaul to iOS for the iPad and some incremental upgrades to the hardware. I disagree with this article 100%. I believe the author to be biased to Android.
Total package is right. Some people (like the author) just don’t get it.
How so? How is Xoom work in progress? That makes no sense.
I am pissed and holding off since it has no Adobe Flash, microSD is disabled, and 4G is not available.
But guess what? iPad 2 will never support any of those things. Wait a week, Flash will come out, wait a few more, new update for microSD will come, and another week will bring 4G module too. Which would you rather have?
Am I missing something?
Yes, that it’s $800.
Kep, Verizon Wireless charges $600 for a Xoom with a 2 year contract or $800 for no contract. For those that use internet each month, you might as well take advantage of the subsidies they offer.
With that being said, I should say that the iPad 2 is wonderful because the cost of the entry level model is a mere $500. This is a huge deal for those that simply want to own an iPad 2.
Motorola will definitely have to push for a sub $500 price point on a WiFi only model very soon to keep sales strong. If they do not, the tablet will simply not sell.
that its $800 before you get the modifications made. im really not missing flash. I rarely come across a video that I cant watch. I spose I can’t play all those crappy flash games that 10 year olds love though…
Here’s a video comparison of the Xoom and the iPad2 side by side. The iPad2 was smooth and responsive. However the Xoom was hilariously clunky. For almost every touch the reviewer made, he had to make it 3 or 4 times just to get the thing to respond.
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2381812,00.asp
I agreed with that PC Mag video until about half way through. He claims that the Xoom has pop up notifications, while the iPad 2 does not. It’s actually the other way around. He is correct that Flash is not (yet) available on the Xoom, but he seems to dismiss the fact that it fully supports HTML 5 video content just like the iPad 2.
Regarding loading mobile versions of web sites, the author also has information backwards. Mobile devices do not determine which version of a web page is loaded. The server detects a device and serves the appropriate format. At this time, most websites send all devices with an “Android” user agent to mobile and it has not been a problem until now. As soon as they make one tweak to separate Honeycomb 3.0 from other Android devices, the problem will be solved. (We had to do the same for Skatter Tech.)
I agree with him that the iPad 2 wins when it comes to apps, hands down. But as I said in this article, you should not dismiss the quality of the pre-installed apps. They do a lot more than the iOS counterparts, look even fancier, and are very responsive too. Those truly set the baseline higher and hint that developers can build interesting apps. And I installed about 30 smart phone apps on the Xoom without any issue, but some are problematic like the one he demoed. Others just flex to a fluid width without stretching to fill the entire screen.
I was a bit astonished by the fact he was having issues with the responsiveness. I filmed a walk-through of Honeycomb and I definitely had no issues – http://skattertech.com/2011/03/video-android-3-0-honeycomb-walk-through/
@Sahas Katta
“He is correct that Flash is not (yet) available on the Xoom, but he seems to dismiss the fact that it fully supports HTML 5 video content just like the iPad 2.”
You might want to reconsider that statement. Android’s implementation of HTML5 is ropey in many areas which is bizarre to say the least.
Ars Technica Review:
“Although Android’s Web browser has inherited some nice features from Chrome, it still doesn’t share Chrome’s superior rendering engine. It lacks Chrome’s robust support for advanced Web features like some of the more complex corners of CSS3. I also noticed occasional rendering glitches that showed up during zooming. The browser’s limitations could prove disappointing for Web developers who are pushing the boundaries of Web standards and rely on the latest HTML5 features”
…
“In light of Google’s vocal enthusiasm for using the Web as an application platform, it’s a bit surprising that the company is so far behind Apple in supporting that vision on a mobile device. When I tested toolkits like JQuery Mobile and Sencha Touch on the Xoom, the gaps in the Honeycomb browser’s rendering engine were painfully apparent. Animated transitions stuttered and certain visual elements were not rendered correctly.”
Look at all the reviews and it will make sense to you. I held off on iPad because I knew the iPad 2 would have camera’s so I waited. Now theres competitors and believe me I looked them over. I gave them all a hard look and read and watched every review out there. After all that for MY needs I will have to go with iPad 2. It has a polished O/S, a fully fleshed out eco-system, a company that designs the hardware and the software for it. And lets not forget it looks great. Motorola does not care about their products like Apple does. If they did then they would have never released the Xoom in its current state. It’s embarrassing.
Apple got plenty of accolades. bye bye.
Yeah. Definitely paid by Google to write this. I am sorry Google, but you can not steal innovation in the tablet segment. There are no hundreds of carriers to give away your Android devices for $50 and in some cases even free to family plan subscribers.
The true separation and contrast of user satisfaction of these two OS’s are most evident in this scenario.
There is no excuse as to why your mud-slinging campaigns claim Apple to be “closed” and therefore bad for consumers, when iOS has all the biggest exclusive games and apps, including Netflix. There is no excuse as to how you claim that Android’s “open-source” nature is better for the consumers, when your marketplace churns out bricks of crap in the least amount of quantities possible and over 250,000 customers have their information stolen and sent to Zimbabwe or God knows where because of 55 virus-infected apps in your “official marketplace.”
The deafening shrieks of naysayers will always be muffled by the depths of reality. In this case: Apple wins.
We are the new standard.
Yeah, and I’m sure Apple paid them to write this one – http://skattertech.com/2011/02/5-things-to-expect-with-the-apple-ipad-2/
They must be making a ton of cash by switching back and forth huh? Or maybe scatter writers actually write unbiased articles unlike the rest… Read what he said before making stupid assumptions.
1) Android tablets will be on AT&T, Verizon, Sprint, T-Mobile and everywhere within no time. WiFi too striaght from manufacturers.
2) This is not arugment about closed vs open source. 55 of 250k apps is 0.022% and they were removed too. iOS is not immune either.
3) Also not argument about who wins. She says Apple is #1. But it is only matter of time until droid tablets win. Same thing already happen for iPhone and Droid phones, Android won after just a year. Android will take over for sure, iPad series will still be strong, but the percentage of users will be less.
Android tablets will advance and eventually reach the point where they can compete with the iPad, but likely not this year. This is the first time many of these manufactures will make a tablet and they’re also working against the volume advantage that Apple has. Cost per unit decreases as volume increases due to fixed costs being spread out over a large volume. Because of this, Apple can sell a similar or superior product at a lower price. I wouldn’t be surprised if at $500, the iPad 2 has a much larger profit margin than the Xoom at $800.
kep – spot on!
Motorola is probably leaking money and barely making profits on Xoom. It’s probably the reason they went to sell with Verizon so they can get more money back from subsidies. Steve Jobs is smart, he makes these things for a fraction of the cost and sells them for way more.
I don’t care for either side, but I WANT the fighting. It will make better stuff come out faster and cheaper too!
You think Apple pays to create buzz?? Haha, wow. You must be an Android fanboy trolling around the internet.
Who ever had to get this article written, you have failed to get the message across, for a simple reason, the reason you specified is silly. The OS is not ground breaking and so you shouldn’t buy it!! How pathetic your idea is… Or may be, you wrote this article just to drive the traffic to your site by making people wonder why the hell they shouldn’t buy one…
definitely the case of writing some BS contrarian article just to get attention… next article up – ‘why japan should welcome Tsunamis’ and ‘Why Ghadaffi should bomb civilian protesters’…
Agreed etchy.
Hey Sid,
You misunderstood my point. iOS was ground breaking, but it no longer is. A lot has happened in a year since the original iPad made a debut and Apple has not changed the software much. I do not know if you have had the chance to try webOS for tablets, BlackBerry Tablet OS, or Honeycomb. Each of them are way more innovative than iOS and really take the tablet form factor into consideration, but they are definitely lagging far behind Apple on App Count.
If you want the iPad 2, there is nothing wrong with that. However, many people do not know about other offerings on the market. Most reviews always compare products to the iPad, rather than explaining the advantages other tablets offer. For instance, Walt Mossberg’s Moto Xoom review used the word iPad at least 10 more times than the word Xoom. How will that help consumers make a valid buying decision?
I think this is an honest opinion about the current state of iOS and I hope that iOS 5 has some major improvements.
I think I prefer “ground-breaking” to broken.
The Xoom is not really a fair comparison. It was an unfinished product rushed to market by management decisions rather than the engineers.
How can any company release a product with three or four missing features from the checklist.
Flash Missing – reliance on Adobe can seriously effect your product – precisely what Steve Jobs said when not putting it on the iPad happened to Motorola. Flash wasn’t ready.
SD Card reader… Except the software doesn’t actually access it yet…
4G requires shipping the product back to the factory for a retro fit “sometime in the next 90 days” bizarre.
USB… It has a USB port but no way to access anything with the current version of the software.
How can anyone say that the Xoom is in the picture. If they shipped it for 300 bucks then maybe they’d have a point. But to get an entry level Xoom you have to shell out an additional 300 bucks over the cost of the entry level iPad to basically be a Beta tester for both Motorola and Google. Sounds like a sucker option to me.
I have a Xoom review unit in front of me and USB works perfectly. I can copy any files whether it’s music, movies, or photos over. It’s essentially plug and play. It appears as a mass storage device and there are pre-created folders for different types of files. You don’t have to use them if you do not want to. Just dump all your stuff onto it and Android will index all the files once you disconnect.
SD Card reader? disabled, yuck. 4G? have to send back, yuck. Flash? at least it’s coming this week.
Flash works fine on the iPad if you use iSwifter… Today.
I think the point here is that it’s hard to say the iPad 2 isn’t the best tablet on the market without looking biased.
I’m fine with open discussion and criticism about bias keeps us honest. But on that note, here’s what I find funny:
When we publish this infographic, people said that Samsung must have paid us – http://skattertech.com/?p=15468
The infographic right before that one had people enraged that Motorola probably paid us – http://skattertech.com/?p=14655
People called me an Apple fanboy for saying that the Atrix might be overcomplicated – http://skattertech.com/?p=14041
Yet people fail to notice when I publish a very critical opinion piece about a the number of crappy Android tablets that came out at CES 2011 – http://skattertech.com/?p=13890
Bottom line, we write unbiased content which we hope will let our readers make informed buying decisions. We do not benefit when someone buys one gadget over another, but will be glad if they are happy with their selection.
With the GPU benchmarks of the iPad 2’s SGX 543MP2 showing it to be more than twice as fast as the Xoom (tegra 2), I’d hardly call that a “slight advancement”, more like “significantly more powerful than anything else currently available”. Unless Nvidia, Texas Instruments, Samsung, or Qualcomm can deliver something with more go than Tegra 2, the iPad 2 and iPhone 5 will reign supreme when it comes to high-performance mobile apps and games until at least Christmas. The fact that most people won’t care about the hardware will give Apple an even greater edge; the iPad 2 is by far best /looking/ tablet, has strong brand recognition and is the right price.
My prediction: Many manufacturers will make tablets, but only the iPad 2 will see great success.
So true…
I agree with your post but lets hope that at least android can become even a small competitor as you want their to be some sort of competition, or at least I do with any technology.
Of course I want competition; I want nothing more than for Google and Microsoft to crush Apple until it the iPad stabilizes with 33.3% market share.
That’s a good point you posed. I didn’t know about that for sure! Do you have a link, I wanna read up more about that.
I’m deciding on these and can’t figure out which one to go with. I’m probably leaning towards waiting to see if a contract free Xoom comes out soon. I already have a smart phone with hotspot, so why pay twice for the same thing?
Yeah I agree iPad 2 is thinnest and coolest looking. Have you held Xoom, my friend’s dad got one from work and it is actually very nice too. It feels VERY different from iPad ONE since it is a wider screen in comparision. Ahhh can’t decide.
I have an iphone4 on att and have it jailbroken so I can get the free wi-fi hotspot. I’ll buy a wi-fi only ipad and get wi-fi from my iphone. No sense in paying for the same access twice =D
I’m actually in the same boat. The Motorola Xoom is too expensive for me in its current state. I just want a Wi-Fi only model around the $500 price point. My main concern is paying for monthly data, which can add up to more than the cost of the device in a two year period. I would rather use the hotspot on my smart phone, which can share the connection with any device I have whether it is a tablet, a netbook, or a regular laptop. Although an always on network is convenient, it’s too expensive unless you have the cash to throw down the drain.
That presupposes that Motorola could hit your wanted price point and make some money, the actual object of releasing product.
The only company that might hit the price will be Samsung, using the profits from it’s components it sells to Apple to subsidize their entry into the tablet market. Apple are already on that one though and the new iPad is using more components from companies other than Samsung…
The problem is that Apple have a huge cash hoard and are using that to get buying power for components. The other companies… not so much.
But keep wishing… you might get your price point when the competition clears their old inventory out, nearer to their quarterly earnings release to boost their bottom line.
The point this article makes is actually a good one, the ipad 2 is not really worth buying until the os is updated and devs have started to take advantage of the new tech, to put it into perspective the ipad2 is most likely amazing but as of the moment no more than a more powerful ipad with a few new features but it will become even better over time and most likely will mature faster than the android tablets. Hopefully Apple is final testing stages of the new IOS but almost all new devices and even gaming systems are released early and mature over the first six months or so via updates.
The same thing could be said for the Xoom and Honeycomb…actually it has, by everyone. In that case, a better headline would have been, “Why you should not buy a tablet”.
Thats funny that i missed my own point, you are exactly right, waiting would be the best option and another review once google or apple updates their os’s would be far more interesting.
Your suggestion for the headline would have been a very good idea. And guess what? I’ll write another article with that headline for sure. Why? Because I have been saying the exact same thing to people for the past year.
Tablets are awesome, but they are yet to offer enough bang for the buck. Tablets still have many flaws and drawbacks that need to be addressed. For instance, take netbooks. Although interest has dropped and these are not nearly as intuitive/fancy as tablets, netbooks have matured a lot over the past few years. One of those would let me get more things done for the type of work I do than a tablet today, but that might change by the end of this year.
Specifications change at the blink of an eye, or with the next model, whichever comes first. The iPad was obviously a game changer. Otherwise there wouldn’t be so many me-too machines. The iPad2 is an incremental upgrade, as expected.
The user experience, however is what draws so many people to the iPhone, iPad and Apple in general. it works. admirably. All the time. It isn’t plagued by viruses, The app store is moderated, thank you, and people have learned to trust it, especially grandma. Some of the newer offerings have features that could be inventive and interesting, but they haven’t the trust that Apple has built over the years. IOS has the same core as MacOS, and it’s stable between the iPhone and iPad. They’re trimmed for the appropriate machine, as are the apps, but they feel alike enough that there is no learning curve.
I suppose one can get used to anything, there are even some who “adore Windows 7.” Tablets have a lot of growing to do, and those developments will change the scenery. Until then though there’s only one reasonable offering for the masses. It truly does come down to feel, and “iOS ran incredibly smoothly.” Enough said.
I sure hope grandma is not Apple’s target demographic..
I’ve used convertible laptop and netbook tablets from Lenovo and Dell that run on Windows 7. My experience? It’s horrible. Microsoft seems to still think that Windows 7 is the right choice for tablets. They will hopefully approach things different with the Windows Phone 7 OS soon.
Ease of use and responsiveness is very important. But it looks like everyone from HP, RIM, and Google have perfected Apple’s secret sauce when it comes to touch enabled devices. The latest breed of tablets operating systems already go above and beyond iOS in many areas.
Agree with the article. iPad is a large iPhone. iPad2 is a… large iPhone. There isn’t anything to iOS at this point. It’s a polished, but empty, slate. The apps are a different story, but looking at the Xoom, with all the information at your fingertips, pushing out to you without opening an app or being interrupted by a pop up notification – it works better.
Apple will catch up, but I think to say the iPad2 is as game changing as the original iPad is extremely short-sighted, and to discount the Xoom is even more so.
Biggest issue is still price – Apple wins here because people want cheap. But it doesn’t make the iOS ‘revolutionary” or “magical”. It’s old hat at this point.
I think the biggest factor is brand recognition, followed by price. The Xoom is totally unheard of and expensive. Android tablets will have to be cost competitive in order to sell since the plethora of models from Motorola, Samsung, HTC, Dell, HP, etc. will never be as recognized as the iPad. The iPad 2 isn’t game changing; it doesn’t have to be. Apple’s goal was to create the cheapest full-featured next generation tablet they could–companies don’t have to innovate when their competitors are playing catch up. Just look at their choice of cameras and LCD panel; their success is making a strong product using (cheaper) last generation technology.
The same thing that happened with smart phones over the past year will happen here. I said it on day one when I co-wrote part of the original Motorola Droid review. — http://skattertech.com/?p=3465 — Although that one phone never did become more recognizable or sell better than the iPhone, it started a revolution. About a year after that, the rush of Android phones as a whole from the manufacturers you mentioned did over take the Apple market share.
Apple’s innovative ideas are important which competitors will eventually execute better. However, Apple will cash in with the iPad 2. I completely agree that they are making great profits since they cut down costs and are charging the same price.
How can it be old hat when nobody has anything on the Market that provides the user experience iOS does. Just as in the computing world, Apple has developed the best all round system by far, and pointing out that it doesn’t do this one thing or that one thing is like rejecting a book because it’s cover is green not red
Wait wait, did you seriously just say “apple has the developed the best all round system by far”, you’re kidding right? Apple is about as innovative as a hipster. The other companies could easily have made tablet computers sooner if they took apple’s approach of “lets put a bigger screen on our smart phone”, but instead they’re actually trying to make a actual tablet computers.
My wife thinks its a big iPhone too. She also told me why would anyone want or need the first iphone 2g. Now she cant live without hers. Hmph.
The iPad2 is probably not worth upgrading to unless you have a burning need for cameras or performance. The competitors are still playing catching up (Don’t forget that Apple had years to perfect the iPad). I didn’t buy the original iPad because I wanted at least a second gen model (Still tempted to wait for 3rd) but looking at all of the tablets on the market at the moment. There is really only one choice.
My worst complaint with Android is that they are still making it up as they go along 3-4 incompatible versions of the OS mean that I have no confidence in hardware support over a year or two. This will change over the next 2-3 years as Android becomes more mature but for the time being its a one tablet market.
Oh and I love the “In the post-PC” sound bite.. ;-)
Yeah that is one thing that is up in the air. Google has said that they intend to merge the Android 3.0 and Android 2.x series platforms together. It will probably happen at the I/O 2011 developer conference this year. Many users were upset with Google essentially abandoning Android 1.x users as they transitioned into v2.0. Since then the three most recent smart phone releases have had full support for one another. You never know, but I hope Google does not drop the ball and turn Honeycomb users into beta users.
Please stop reading boxes and spec sheets then reviewing a product.
What tablet has 4g? Witch one has Flash? How about expandable memory? Not iPad and NOT XOOM!
Out the box for over $800.00 Motorola gives you an I-O-U. None of the “Better Than iPad” features work!
4G?? You have to send your Xoom in for upgrade!! When that upgrade is available, and who knows how long till that is.
The mSD card reader, not yet enabled. And Mobile Adobe Flash won’t be released till later this year.
So. By the time Xoom is fully functional, you might as well consider iPad “3”.
Very valid point, but keep in mind that the Xoom already has equivalent features (more or less) of the iPad 2 even without those three drawbacks. Motorola definitely was in a rush to get their tablet out the door, which is why this happened.
Adobe Flash update is out next week and the 4G upgrade should be an option within a few weeks according to Motorola.
Don’t forget that new buyers of the Xoom will not have to send a device in for 4G outfitting once the module becomes available.
Unless Motorola screws up even more, they should hopefully resolve these issues within a month.
There are other opinions in addition to ScatteredTech’s opinion, but the tablet of choice will depend on what you need or want a tablet for. It is a just a luxury, but if a simple iPad can replace your daughter in grade school’s need to carry 50 pounds of books in a backpack everyday, then get one. If you are into mapping all the neighborhood hot spots by speed per hour, then a Tab for your pen protector is just the ticket. iPads have been around for at least a year. Buy Android or Honeycomb and you are a beta-tester. Xoom still can’t do Flash until late next week and to get 4G, you need to send in your Xoom for a week and that won’t even happen until 3 months from now. Then, you will need to buy a data plan. Aren’t you paying enough already for phone and WiFi? They’re already using iPads in hospitals and behind the cosmetics counter. You see them in use on TV shows. The US Army bought a ton of them, and law enforcement use them because one hand on an iPad means the other hand can be on the gun. They use iPads to sell Real Estate and show Websites. They even use them in restaurants to display wine lists and menus; and movies and commercials use them for scriptwriting and reading as well as for storyboards and shot lists; and now editing.
Just as would buy a car, check out an actual product. Feel it. Play with it. Kick the tires (not literally!) and then find someone who has one and check out all the applications that are available. Check out GarageBand and iMovie at the Apple website. They’re a mere $5 each, but if music or video is your passion, then the iPad is for you. If you have an iPhone or a Mac, you know about Facetime. If you are a teacher, or a presenter, check out how easily you can get what’s on your iPad onto a big screen as well as how easy it is to create materials for your presentation. Unlike the Samsung commercials that present their tablet as an “advanced laptop”, or Xoom’s pretentious commercials that have you imagining that you are inside a space ship, the iPad is just a way of accessing what’s important to you with the use of finger swipes, anywhere you want to. It’s a tool that makes it a easy to access what you need and want. It’s not a laptop and it’s not a spaceship. Do your homework. The tablet you buy, you will eat with, play with, and sleep with. Otherwise, stick with your laptop, TV, desktop, music player and phone.
I disagree with this article 100% and I don’t think the author fully understands the bigger picture when it comes to iOS. I believe that one day iOS will succeed Mac OS X as they slowly add OS X features into iOS when the time is right. iOS will power everything Apple sells, so when an app is created for iOS it will work on anything whether it be an iPhone, iPod, iPad, or a Mac, and Apple will only have to support one platform. In my eyes I see iOS as a huge advantage when buying the iPad 2. What’s Google doing with Android? where is Android’s future, They’re releasing Chrome OS soon and that works completely different to Android, they are pretty much competing with themselves, and I don’t think Google knows what they are doing, because they plan to support 2 platforms that are pretty much trying to achieve the same thing, thats a bit counter productive don’t you think?
Sure other tablets look better on paper compared to the iPad, but the iPad is more than just hardware and software its an experience, which I believe to be the best on the market.
I actually completely agree with you. I think we just misunderstood one another. Apple’s big focus is definitely iOS since it is a bigger money maker for the company than Mac OS X. As you said, the upcoming OS X Lion already has hints of iOS inside ( http://www.apple.com/macosx/lion/ ). But with that being said, I stand by my point that iOS is getting weak in its current state. I’m very confident that iOS 5 will leapfrog far ahead of competitors, but we still haven’t heard anything official.
Regarding Android and Chrome OS, I don’t think those are going to interfere with one another. Android is their clear focus at this time, which runs on phones, tablets, and even Google TV (yuck!). It already over took the worldwide market share of all the competition aside from Nokia. I think that Chrome OS is merely an experimental research phase for Google. They are trying to see whether it could potentially be a replacement for desktop platforms such as Windows 7 or Mac OS X for light weight users.
Setting geeks aside, most people only watch videos, write text documents, browse photos, print occasionally, and surf the web. That means that the majority only touch the surface of full blown operating systems. Yet the only option is to pay $700 for a decent laptop that is probably overkill for what they need to do. Chrome OS could potentially make simple workstations available for less than half that price.
Blackberry, HP. The difference between these and the iPad is that the iPad is an actual product you can purchase right now. We’ll compare the products when they come out.
We can compare the iPad to android tablets. Stores that sell the android tablets should have the iPad side by side for comparison. Users can make the right choice then. A good measure of this is the return rates for the tablets. That should give us a good idea.
The reality is this the ipad and ipad2 are great devices and certainly have changed the landscape of portable computing. I don’t think that’s even debateable. The problem is the arrogance of apple and that the world is not one sze fits all. I dont like the fact that I can get more than 65GB of hardware space and there is not provision for adding extra needed memory. It means I still need to carry a laptop for all real computing needs. Apple will loose this war for one very simple reason people want options they don’t and never have wanted “The world according to Jobs”. Why do you think there is so much time and attention devoted to “Jail breaking”. They lost the battle of the personal computer to microsoft by closing their architecture and as sure as the sun rises and sets the’ll f*ck this up too and harvard business students will do case studies on their demise and of the and lost opportunities of the iphone and ipad. Androids app store will catch up for every single developer who is writing programs will surely write a version for both. So buy what you want I would like something a little bit smailler than my ipad it is just to cumbersome to use with one hand I always feel like I might drop it. My bet is the Ipad 3 will have 2 sizes the size we see now will disappear and a 12″ model will take its place and be like a netbook. and apple will also come out with an 8″ version a smaller more compact one that is still large enough to be a valuable user experience but small enough to carry in a coat pocket. I own an ipad but mostly use it around the house for convenience. It’s great to sit on the couch and get a couple of emails out or surf the web. also I have traveled with it on the plane it’s a great traveler. I will probably buy the LG Optimus Pad when it comes out later this month. Form factor, expansion and customization being the criteria for my decision.
Jeff,
I think you are overlooking one thing. Until now consumers have had to divulge a large some of money even if their computing needs are rather light weight. The cost of entry for a Mac OS X laptop is about $1000 and a it costs at least $700 for a decent Windows 7 laptop. You are right that tablets does not yet fulfill enough features to replace a machine, but that is going to change.
With the advent of affordable tablets, a new line will be drawn to separate information consumers from content creators. This was not possible until now. I’m sure this is a huge scare for Microsoft since the abandonment rate for traditional Windows computers will begin to increase within a matter of time.
Funny article; a clear hack job for Google! Or the so-called writer (who must have generously lifted from Motorola and/or Google’s press releases) lives in a Bizarro world where the Xoom has incomparably superior hardware & software over the iPad. And reminder to self: classify this blog under “Techie Joke Site”.
A fair article. I recently bought an iPad 2, and while I love it, I admit I did it more out of my own obsession with Apple products, and it would probably be far from impartial evaluation of the product’s merits. I’m sure most of the people here who are spouting hate and vitriol at this writer are just hugely obsessed fans like me, but are simply too scared to admit it. There was once a time when people used to honestly and openly disclose that they were Apple/Mac fans, but now the Apple community has been overrun with rabid lemmings incapable of critical thinking. It’s a sad situation. Once upon a time, the Apple community was all about promoting healthy competition and trust, but now it has been about triumphalism and delusions of supremacy.
That being said, it’s not that the iPad (or 2) isn’t a bad product – it’s great – but I’ve tried my friends’ Xooms (yes, in the plural), and I have to say that they’re really strong competition too. The first thing you must realise is that Google takes a different computing paradigm, which is probably why most narrow-minded Apple fans can’t even begin to understand why so many people are buying the Xoom. And probably why they probably still can’t understand why people still buy Microsoft Windows instead of their beloved Mac OS X.
Trust me, competition is good. If any of you had actually been with Apple from the 90s (which is probably unlikely), you don’t want the industry to end up like Microsoft.
Thanks for the honest and down to earth comment. I agree with your statements. The iPad 2 is the best affordable solution on the market, but that does not mean we would over look the fact that iOS has yet to improve. I would like to see something cutting-edge in iOS 5.
I had an original iPad, but I’m holding off on the iPad 2 until the software improves. I don’t own a tablet at the moment aside from a temporary Motorola Xoom review unit, courtesy of Verizon Wireless. I’m considering buying a new Android 3.0 tablet, but the prices are too expensive and I do not want any ties with carriers. A WiFi model would be beyond ideal for me since I have a smart phone with a hot spot.
And you are spot on about the 90s. Apple’s competition really got Microsoft out of full blown dominance. It was a good thing and the coexistence of both is still great. It pushes everyone to create better products at better prices!
What a pathetic article. The author states it does not own an iPad but has some, albeit quite limited experience, with the device. Then to go on with a critique of the user interface with this quite limited experience is just disingenuous and, of course, dishonest. There’s no way Google paid for this as it is such a pathetic article it cannot be considered adequate legal consideration for payment of monies. Right now there is only one tablet/slate manufacturer on the market, Apple. To expressly or implicitly state otherwise is to simply misunderstand the state of the market.
every reviewers experience with gadgets (in general) is limited. how long do you think engadget/gizmodo has to review iPad 2? less than a week at most. same goes for xoom or any other tablet.
you don’t need to own one to be able to write something about it. if you write car reviews, do you need to own every car? no.
Good points in this article. I had already made up my mind to hold off and wait for android tablet., xoom will be priced right with the wifi only model which should ber pity in a few weeks. The samsung 10.1 inch tab looks great and it is on the horizon and same weight as i pad 2 which now really doesn’t interest me after seeing all that the new honeycomb os has to offer.
This article is obviously biased but what all this really comes down to is that apple is continuously ahead of the game from the iPod to their computers to the phones to the tablets. Everyone else is always playing catch up…so yes they will eat away at their market share once they put out their models but when apple comes out with their next innovation it will happen all over again. All of this comes down to prefferance but the iPad has appeal and ease of use for myself my wife and my 8 year old daughter and even my 17 month old. Yes there may be others that could do the same kinds of things at some point but why bother taking a chance when it’s all there already for you in the iPad.
How is Apple continuously ahead? Apple fans always brag about how innovative and advanced Apple is, but can’t seem to mention any specifics. What makes it easy to use, for instance?
I ordered the iPad2 and expect it in on 3-16th, the Black, 3G, 32 GIG, Verizon model. I’ve had the first iPad but only the WiFi version with AT&T so I’m well familiar with iPad. My husband and I went to Best Buy to try the iPad2 and fell in love with it immediately, to the point, my husband said he’s getting a divorce and marrying it. Oh well: can’t win them all. The main reason we went to Brest Buy to try it before ordering, was to try the incredible iPad stylus from STYLUS-R-US we now have 2 each of, to make sure they worked on this screen as incredible as they do on the first iPad. They do. Even better. They truly make all of the other stylus look pitiful. I also want to say, (and the reason they’ll probably not allow this to be posted) that all of these reviewers, though they do mention all of the great iTunes apps for the iPads, they actually believe, any of the other facts and figures and OS of other systems, carry more weight than all of the apps. It’s the apps that make any device scream, and sing, and dance, and bring all of the fun. NOT one of these other devices can compare with the iPad and iTunes combo. Don’t let any reviewer kid you. All of the other large screen devices are pretty and cool and nice…but after you buy them, you’ll kick your old fat butt for not getting the iPad and having tons of great stuff to put in them. The apps are incredible!! Goo Apple! Go iPad 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 & 235225.
Hi Sarha,
I saw your post several weeks ago, I guess shortly after you posted it and read about your stylus with STYLUS-R-US. In thinking you were telling the truth and not just a shill for the company, I bought the Entrepreneur and the New Jersey and omg are you ever correct. They don’t require any pressure at all and for note taking and drawing they are awesome. Thank you so much for sharing this with us. I’ve tossed my PoGo, Boxwave, Dagi, Griffin, and Alu out the window. Good post girl.
Sahas’ Boss: “Sahas, I’ve got an assignment for you, write a provocative controversial article about the iPad 2 — you know, something negative — so it’ll get a big reaction.
I’m the boss. :-)
Awesome being your own boss!
gazillion glorifying ipad 2 reviews, no problem!
one slightly critical ipad 2 article, hell breaks loose!
To those supporting Apple in the comments:
Seriously, take a look at the other upcoming tablets. Look at the playbook, look at the touchpad, look at Honeycomb. Apple has such fantastic marketing that they have you all convinced that the ipad (2) is the only decent tablet out there, with pathetic competition from the xoom. Look at the specs and software the competition offers. Generally, the competition is better than the ipad in both of these areas. The only reasons to buy an ipad that I can think of are the huge app store (which is filled with apps that I believe to be horrible quality), the fact that it is proven, unlike the new tablets, or the “cool” factor. When it becomes clear which tablets are truly the best, their app stores will grow, they will gain recognition and the ipad will no longer be the only cool kid on the block. I’ll be getting a playbook as soon as I can.
You’re absolutely right. It IS all about the OS. Which is why I’ll be buying a PlayBook on April 10th.
Very well-written article. The truth is, the Xoom is temporarily missing features that the ipad 2 will never have and people are using these deficiencies against it. It is refreshing to read articles from writers that don’t drink the apple kool-aid all day long (like M.G. Siegler at Techcrunch and other writers at Engadget)
Great article! You don’t come across as an Apple hater, but point out the weak points in their operating system. The whole Android ecosystem is just way better.